Wednesday, 6 April 2011

My letter to Brent Council Executive to Save Local Libraries

At the Attention: ANN JOHN OBE (Strategy and policy co-ordination)

Dear Ann,

I am a resident of Brent, living in Dollis Hill, although my library in Willesden High Street has been saved this time around, I am deeply concerned by the consequences for other residents of the borough living in Kensal Rise, Barham Park, Cricklewood, Neasden, Preston, and Tokyngton.

I have read the Intervention plan from the "Save Kensal Rise Library" campaigning group, to keep running the library at 2/3 less than current cost while improving services. 

Why do you stubbornly persist in going ahead with the closure of the libraries when there is clearly a cost effective alternative?

At the start of the year Brent opened a public consultation to supposedly ask residents ' opinion on the closure of libraries. I believe you received an unambiguous "NO". So why do you ask your citizens' opinion if it is to do just the opposite? To make us believe that our say counts in this democratic society we live in?  It does not seem so!

This decision you are making against the overwhelming majority of Brent residents will have a damaging effect primarily on the level of literacy among kids from disadvantaged social backgrounds.  Secondly you are taking from "us" a community space that plays a vital role in social cohesion.  

My voice is joined by 8 other Brent residents living in my house and many more I believe.

I urged you to have a minute of reflection, come to the libraries, talk to residents and think of the consequences of your decisions. When the Brent executive meeting comes on Monday 11 April at 7pm  remember all the residents that have faith in you to represent them, save the libraries. 

Your sincerely,
Sandra DeA

RESPONSE FROM: LESLEY JONES (HR, diversity, local democracy and consultation)


Dear Sandra,
No one is happy with the possibility of libraries closing. It is a sensitive and emotive issue.  But with the savage cuts imposed on us by the coalition government, we have no choice if statutory services are to be maintained. It is not Brent councillors being stubborn but councillors attempting to manage the situation central government have created for local authorities.
For at least 12 years senior library managers have advised councillors that there was a need to review locations and “rationalise” our libraries if we were to maintain buildings and reach national library standards. They have advised over the years that maintaining all libraries was not sustainable in the long term. No administration in the past 12 years has had the courage to heed this advice because it is such a sensitive issue. With the Libraries Transformation project, we are committed to have remaining libraries open each day, with a good level of new stock and other facilities.
I do understand the feeling expressed but we have not choice but to make severe cuts in ALL service budgets. This year the cut is £37m. By the end of the month we will have to start planning for the further reductions government expects us to make - around £100m over four years.  We will have lost around 500 council jobs at all levels by the end of 2011.

It is appreciated that community groups put in considerable effort to produce business plans and that there were some good aspects in almost all.  They were thoroughly evaluated.  However, it was made clear to all wishing to consider a business plan to take over a site that there should be NO cost and NO risk to the council. Unfortunately, no plan achieved this basic aim and some did not take account of essentials such as employment law or health and safety aspects. All assumed contributions from the council over one or more years, contributions we cannot afford to make, either now or in the near future.
Regards.
Cllr Lesley Jones



References:
Save Kensal Library - campaigning group
Facebook - Save Kensal Library!
NewStatesman - Zadie Smith speaks out in defence of libraries
Willesden & Brent TImes: Brent Council to close six libraries in the borough despite residents’ protests
Guardian - Library campaigners demand public inquiry into closures
Independent - Overdue! The fight to save our libraries begins
The bookSeller - Campaigners hand in 6,000-strong petition over Brent library

Thursday, 31 March 2011

March For The Alternative - Why they are here and who they are 26.03.11

The March for the Alternative was organised by the TUC and joined by UK Uncut, a self-organised direct action group.

While the Trade Unions marched toward Hyde Park where this film was made, the UK Uncut under the "Shut Down London" operation was targeting "Tax Dodgers" retailers. Their philosphy is non violent and consist in entering the shops, in this case Fortum and Mason and do "sit-downs" with their placards. Obviously shoppers don't feel like buying anything... then the shop manager has to shut down... Mission accomplished :-)

In this film the protesters have been asked why they are here and who they are



While interviewing people from different walks of life, I realise that they all shared a common characteristic. They care for others. They are conscious of the implications of these Public Service spending cuts on their friends, family and local communities.

There was half a million of people coming to London from across the UK to show their opposition to this Tory Libdem lead government spending cut bill. Many citizens that aspired to change, voted for the Liberal Democrats at the general election thinking that it will make a difference. Most of them, feel deeply betrayed and question the true value of democracy. If we are in a democracy, why is it that our "representatives" once elected do not keep their promises. Does our voice count? This government instead of acknowledging the overwhelming opposition to Public Service cuts, they use the media propaganda of the state to divert the public opinion from this truth and focus on minor incidents that have been made bigger than they really are.

What's next?

The people that came to the protest know that all of this is no true. Until we rely on the BBC to tell us what's happening we will be kept submerge from real consciousness and unable to fight for our rights to health, education, settler.... It is time to get back our power and be listen to. Keep up to date.

References:
Filming and Editing: Sandra De Andrade
Interviewer: Liz Rojas
Music: Zapac Test Drive

Wednesday, 2 March 2011

The End of Poverty film


“End of Poverty?” a good question. It is the title of Philippe Dias documentary that received numerous awards and recognitions. This week The Tipping Point Film Fund organised the screening at the Lexi cinema.

I always wondered how people can be hungry and poor when nature can produce anything we need to at least not to be hungry.

One of the most striking scenes was a group of Kenyan farmer showing their devastated land and dying animals. Just two miles away, a foreign corporation has just opened. A recent built dam has destroyed all their cultures bringing cholera and other forms of deceases. To make things worse, the rice produced in their land is sold abroad and does not even nourish their own people.



The economical system and financial institutions created by the west keeps developing countries under-development.  This neo-liberalism system is the continuation of colonization. It sucks all the wealth produced in poor countries in debt repayment to the West creditors.
Through the imposition of debt, the countries lose their sovereignty…. letting external vested interests dictate the country policies.

It is happening here:
Until recently Europe was protected from the side effects of the market. Now it is happening here! The financial crisis has justified savage cuts in the welfare system and the selling of public service units (Gaz, Water, Electricity, Telecommunication….) to private interests. There is no real political alternative, the “right” says large fast cuts and the “left” says cuts but not so fast. Their argument is we have too much debt! Non sense! We always had debt! It is part of the functioning of the capitalist system.

Critics:
From the floor – in the audience someone pointed out that English subtitles were only use when black speakers were speaking when American-Asians clearly had an accent. I think it is a pity that the film director did not challenge his own prejudice. In my point of view, the film is a bit too long partly due to the large quantity of interviews. Philippe Diaz could have cut on few speakers. Some discourses were repetitive and did not add further information. Moreover, some historic explanations about the colonisation were simplistic.

Conclusion:
The “End of Poverty?” is very rich and triggers many questions that need to be investigated separately. A long debate about aid followed in the audience.The successful role of UKUncut in the organisation of grassroot spontaneous protests to expose tax-doding corporations.

Further reading that reinforce the idea of western economies responsibility in the extreme poverty of the South.

Panel discussion speakers:
The New Economics Foundation is an independent think-and-do tank that inspires and demonstrates real economic well-being...

War on Want fights poverty in developing countries in partnership with people affected by globalisation. they campaign for human rights and against the root causes of global poverty, inequality and injustice.
This film is supported by:
STWR advocates for essential resources such as food, water and energy to be shared internationally under the agency of the UN in order

Tuesday, 1 February 2011

A day embedded in the student protest – Sat 29 January 2011


I joined a small group of activists to produce jointly a film covering the National Protest organised by NCA£C and lead by students to tell the story that is not getting told.

My contribution to the project was the filming of the character embodied in Flaminia, an Italian masters degree student at Goldsmith University.


If it does not play; click here.

Last Saturday 29 January 2011, I joined Flaminia at the National Protest meeting point in Mallet Street, London. She was with a few other students from her university getting ready for the march.
This National demonstration was called by National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts in the absence of action by NUS (National Union Student). 

Aaron Porter, the president of the National Union Student has been asked to step down as he has lost his legitimacy in representing students since last November protest that saw students hurt, arrested and prosecuted. Students’ words are hard but irrevocable “Aaron must step down”. At the core of the recrimination a profound let down explained in Laurie Penny’s article

So why are students protesting when the university raise in tuition fees to £9,000 per year bill has already  been voted in Parliament since December 9th December 2010?

They see their fights against the raise in tuition fees as part of the Tories’ ideological spending cuts strategy. They don’t understand why they should be paying that amount of money when corporations like Top-shop, Vodafone…. are avoiding billions in taxation as UK uncut pointed out. Moreover, they are worried about their future and the prospect of finding a job in this current economical climate. What support is the state going to give them? 

Since the overwhelming majority of the population seem apathetic` at the daily announcement of spending cuts, students feel compelled to act for all of us in the hope that their fight will trigger a wake-up call across the society.  They dream of a unified movement where cleavage of class, age or sex ceases to fight a common goal following the path of their bothers in Tunisia and Egypt. 

You could see the disappointment of the students when they realised that their protest was losing momentum at the Egyptian embassy…still they are not defeated they will return more united than ever having learned from their mistakes. 

Read about :
The story of UK Uncut by Samira Shackle

Join: